Slow Travel Talk  Hop To Forum Categories  MISCELLANEOUS  Hop To Forums  How Do I??? Forum & Website Questions    Thought-Restaurant reviews alternative

Moderators: Kim

Closed Topic Closed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
  Login/Join 

Slow Traveler
Posted
Janet, was just raving about a place I recommended to her in Albarese, Osteria Del Orco. I feel it is in a special class that deserves a mark,star whatever to identify that it is worth going out of the way.I posted on her thread it is on my list of top 10 ever in Italy.

I was thinking just going through the reviews that there are happy faces in most reviews which is OK, but no Immediate way to mark stellar places.If someone dosn't spend 2 hours reading every review they may miss an oportunity. RR
 
Posts: 6523 | Location: Culver City, CA, USA | Registered: 08 November 2002Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Forum Admin
Posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 15068 | Location: Casa dei Cerrbiati, NJ, USA | Registered: 16 June 2001Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
All reviews by there nature are subjective. More than 95% of the reviews here are smiles, which is OK but not ideal.In reality when you read the reviews they range from moderately Ok to fabulous/world class. The only way to destinguish places is to read every review. In some areas(Florence/Rome etc.) it is time consuming.

Adding several levels with a range would be even better than the two options of either a smile or a frown. I also think it's important to review bad places,so others can avoid them. On at least one occasion I would have avoided a place(when I returned 3-4 others also said they had a bad experiences there but had not posted. I suppose as they "Didn't want want to be negative")

Information is a good thing. All reviews would not have to be redone, but all reviews after a given date could be given ranges,stars,number/100 etc.
RR
 
Posts: 6523 | Location: Culver City, CA, USA | Registered: 08 November 2002Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Matriarch
Posted Hide Post
Good thinking, RR, but IMHO too complicated!

I would not write a review if I had to give the restaurant a point rating. And I just like to read what people say.

Maybe I'm just too tired from my move, or just too, too old, but SIMPLER IS BETTER!
 
Posts: 6955 | Location: Montclair, NJ, USA | Registered: 16 March 2003Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Moderator
Posted Hide Post
quote:
On at least one occasion I would have avoided a place(when I returned 3-4 others also said they had a bad experiences there but had not posted. I suppose as they "Didn't want want to be negative")
So, a 'star' system wouldn't have helped, because those people didn't even submit reviews.

As someone who regularly sends in restaurant and hotel reviews (and uses ST reviews to help plan trips), I honestly don't think a star system would be much better than the current "recommended, "neutral," and "not recommended" descriptions.

Two ideas, though:
1) We can encourage people (in the review form) to include something like "TOP TEN dining experience" in their short review so it's clear in a quick scan of the reviews that the restaurant is a step above the rest.

2) Some of the older reviews are still using the original smiley options of Smile and Frown before we added the neutral icon (which some deserved). I will co-opt another mod Big Grin to help me review them and update the Smile as appropriate to neutral.
 
Posts: 14290 | Location: The Beautiful San Francisco Bay Area | Registered: 06 August 2001Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  

Closed Topic Closed

    Slow Travel Talk  Hop To Forum Categories  MISCELLANEOUS  Hop To Forums  How Do I??? Forum & Website Questions    Thought-Restaurant reviews alternative

© SlowTrav.com 2000 - 2008