Slow Travel Talk  Hop To Forum Categories  TRAVEL  Hop To Forums  Everything About Travel    what would you prefer

Moderators: Kim, Roz
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Slow Traveler
Posted
A job that pays really well but you can take only 3 weeks vacation per year maximum (all 3 weeks paid) but you can only take 2 weeks at a single time OR a job that let's you take 5 weeks off a year..2 weeks paid and the rest unpaid, you can take all at once if you so wish but the job pays less.
 
Posts: 141 | Location: Irvine, CA | Registered: 13 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
Okay... if I was younger, say 20's & 30's, I'd take the better pay; less vacation.

Now that I am older....50's... give me the second one!


Doug

ANCORA IMPARO
 
Posts: 2094 | Location: Winter Park, FL | Registered: 18 May 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
How much less pay? If one is half the salary of the other then its not worth the lost money
RR
 
Posts: 6503 | Location: Culver City, CA, USA | Registered: 08 November 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
Hi, I would take any of the jobs, but I would take with more pleasure a job that has 5 weeks vacation paid (my husband just got this in a new job and I believe this is great since he still has a good salary and it is a European company, so they know how to live better and take a break). Wink Grin

At my work I can take 3 weeks paid and could take 5-12 weeks unpaid (my choice), and now that I have a child I am thinking of taking both. Since my revenue is now second anyway, I think, I could manage with less money. Smile

Now, this is something I would never do when I was younger or even in a couple, but I am just so exhausted most of the time, that no money could compensate a good vacation. Chicken Dance
 
Posts: 1007 | Location: Montreal, Canada | Registered: 06 May 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
The answer depends on whether you live in order to work, or work in order to live.
 
Posts: 1923 | Location: Paris, France | Registered: 01 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
KT

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
I know that we're all supposed to say that we'd take the job with more vacation, but not everybody in the world can afford to do so.
 
Posts: 690 | Location: San Francisco Bay Area | Registered: 28 June 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
So many variables to consider....

This reminds of the Book of questions!

It would depend on how much a decrease in pay it was.

and then I would consider my non negotiable financial responsibilities.


and now that I'm married, I would need to consult my DH..

Smile ( that's still the strangest thing for me ~ getting married at 40)


I think if the number crunch was less than a 25% hit financially

I would take the 5 weeks.
 
Posts: 163 | Location: SFO Bay Area, California Native | Registered: 11 June 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
quote:
I would take any of the jobs
Especially in the current economy. Wink
 
Posts: 253 | Location: Maryland | Registered: 04 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
I would take the jobs and have a wonderful two weeks. Save up as I go and then when I retire use all those savings for the trips I didn't get to go on while working. You can never have too much money saved for the later years!
 
Posts: 230 | Registered: 19 July 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
I would work 2 jobs during those months in order to take the 5 weeks off.

I guess I work hard to play. Life is short!!!
Y'all enjoy~
Sandi
 
Posts: 1500 | Location: Alabama | Registered: 12 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
Can you afford going on holidays for 5 weeks with the salary of the "5 weeks" job? This is the question!
I had a 6 months off job for years but during the first years I didn't make enough money to do anything during my 6 months off... now it's the other way round: I have a 12 months job and plenty of money to go on holiday.. there must be something wrong Wink Grin
 
Posts: 1939 | Location: Urbino, Le Marche, Italy | Registered: 09 October 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
It has to be the Italian way of thinking because I was reading the posts and I was planning on writing exactly what Giulia wrote!!!

There is no point on having a job that gives you a lot of free time if you have no money to do anything with it! Wink
 
Posts: 3194 | Location: Upper Maremma; Tuscany; Italy | Registered: 19 October 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
Do both jobs pay "enough"?

Other then that it depends on how expensive your holidays are. Plenty of people would just grab a backpack and go hiking in the national parks etc. If you live close enough the cost to go on holiday isn't very high.
 
Posts: 633 | Registered: 07 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
quote:
OR a job that let's you take 5 weeks off a year..2 weeks paid and the rest unpaid, you can take all at once if you so wish but the job pays less.


I'd take the second, get a union in there and do something about the forced 3 weeks of unpaid vacation.

Unions fought for paid vacation in the first place, a union could fix that! Happy

Oh, in the interest of disclosure, I work for a union. Happy
 
Posts: 2451 | Location: Burlington, ON, Canada | Registered: 12 April 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
We are living it. Happy Happy

My husband is retired, no problem there. We started this year in Venice, returned to San Francisco the last week of January; then I worked hard and long hours Eek for three months; then the next three months here in Paris (going home to San Francisco the end of next week); work again for another three months; and then three months in Venezia for thanksgiving, christmas and new year. Angel

I get paid 4 week vacation, the rest is unpaid. It takes a lot of budgeting but we are living the life we prefer.

Joanna's Dancing Man Joanna's Dancing Man
 
Posts: 458 | Location: san francisco but so excited being in Venezia for the holidays!! | Registered: 22 April 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
I would take the 5 weeks vacation job.

It doesn't worth it to get more money if you cannot enjoy life.

As per "work now, wnjoy later" philosophy, no, thanks.
Some of my friend died at 35-40.

Worked hard to enjoy later then...nothing.

I work hard, don't get me wrong, but I want time to see and enjoy the world, NOW. Cause Now is all we have for sure.

Peace.


www.il-girasole.com

"Your mind not only wanders, it sometime leaves completely..."
 
Posts: 2079 | Location: Cortona, Tuscany, Italia | Registered: 29 October 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Moderator
Posted Hide Post
In all honesty, I'd take the job where I'd be more likely to begin and end the day with a smile on my face. Vacations and travel are lovely, but I spend a hell of a lot more of my life working than vacationing, even given the three weeks difference given in the question.
Garlic Man


Amy in MA
Amy's Travel Blog--Destination Anywhere
My 18 Vacation Rental Reviews and 5 Trip Reports
"A traveler without knowledge is a bird without wings."--Sa'di, Gulistan (1258)

 
Posts: 8582 | Location: Newton (outside Boston), MA | Registered: 17 June 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
I would agree with Amy. Maybe both jobs are the same, in which case I would go for more leave but if not, go with the one which makes you happy day to day.
 
Posts: 302 | Location: Afghanistan (home Andalucia, Spain) | Registered: 27 January 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
I assumed that both the jobs were similar, but if not, I agree with Amy and Eliza, get the one that will make you happier on a day by day base.


www.il-girasole.com

"Your mind not only wanders, it sometime leaves completely..."
 
Posts: 2079 | Location: Cortona, Tuscany, Italia | Registered: 29 October 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Amy:
In all honesty, I'd take the job where I'd be more likely to begin and end the day with a smile on my face. Vacations and travel are lovely, but I spend a hell of a lot more of my life working than vacationing, even given the three weeks difference given in the question.
Garlic Man

Amy, I am with you! For a year I worked in a job where I had five weeks vacation, really great benefits, 37.5 hour work week, subsidized cafeteria, etc. I even had a company car for a few months. But I was miserable! I hated the job and I really didn't like the people, which meant that every day I was dreading going to work. So when I was on vacation I wasn't happy anyway. If it had been a regular boring old job, maybe it would have been fine, but I honestly felt such a dislike for the whole thing.

Now I work in the field I love, no benefits, long days (especially lately), no real job security (short term contracts) but it doesn't matter cause I love it! (Of course I wish I had benefits but hopefully one day I can get them. Plus I try to save and live below my means in case of emergencies.)

I am taking three weeks unpaid vacation in August. Not ideal, but still. Sorry if I derailed the discussion, but I thought Amy had a very good point!
 
Posts: 777 | Location: Washington, DC | Registered: 08 May 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
quote:
I would take the 5 weeks vacation job.

It doesn't worth it to get more money if you cannot enjoy life.

As per "work now, wnjoy later" philosophy, no, thanks.
Some of my friend died at 35-40.

Worked hard to enjoy later then...nothing.

I work hard, don't get me wrong, but I want time to see and enjoy the world, NOW. Cause Now is all we have for sure.


Yes on every level. YES a thousand times and then some.
 
Posts: 2818 | Location: Los Angeles | Registered: 03 May 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
My father had some very good advice for me when I hit the work force 35 years (or so) ago.

"If you find something to labor at that you enjoy then it's a labor of love. If you labor at something you hate: it's just labor!"

More money and better benefits does not always mean the job is 'enjoyable'.

Take the one that will reward you with great working conditions. It'll pay off in the end!


Doug

ANCORA IMPARO
 
Posts: 2094 | Location: Winter Park, FL | Registered: 18 May 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Gathering Hero