Slow Travel Talk  Hop To Forum Categories  TRAVEL  Hop To Forums  United Kingdom & Ireland    WORD GAME: US English vs. English English
Page 1 ... 20 21 22 23

Moderators: kaydee, TourMama
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
I remember 'uni' having taken over from 'varsity' by the time I was a freshman in 1967.
The categories then were oxbridge, red brick, and the new universities such as Sussex, Lancaster, Essex. I didn't see any of the adjectives as pejorative. Cambridge, Manchester, and Sussex were all good choices for Biochemistry. I remember going through reviews of the courses at many universities and discussing relative merits with other 6th formers. The internet will have transformed this. Probably, UCCA no longer exists, and if it is like Aus, you don't get interviewed by the faculty before being offerred a place anymore.


John
"There are two types of problems: those that solve themselves, and those which you can do nothing about"
Isabel Allende's grandmother
 
Posts: 1710 | Location: Mullumbimby, NSW, Australia | Registered: 26 March 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Moderator
Posted Hide Post
quote:
I remember 'uni' having taken over from 'varsity' by the time I was a freshman in 1967.


Really? I was a 'fresher' in 1971, and don't remember the term being used, either by my fellow Durham students or by anyone at school: I'd always seen it as something far more recent - Panda's explanation fitted my perception. But maybe we were just very old fashioned in Durham...

UCCA still exists, though it's now called UCAS.

Jonathan
 
Posts: 3405 | Location: Stroud, UK | Registered: 18 November 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
John may of course be right about Australia - that's the point. "Varsity" was dead by the end of WW2, I think, other than as the name of the Cambridge student paper. But "uni" was unheard of until about 15-20 years ago in the UK. "Neighbours" is definitely the culprit (and probably for Upspeak as well).

As for the Ivy League comparator: there isn't quite one. Universities group themselves in various ways for their pronouncements on Government policy, particularly about funding, as Panda says, and there are various subtle and not-so-subtle attempts to put each other down (some wag used to refer to the former Oxford Poly as the Shorter Oxford University). But - and here I speak from experience - when it comes to marketing to students and the general public, there's never quite enough common ground for a fixed shared identity.

I ought, of course, to have researched the thread thoroughly, but while I'm here, have we had:

UK: Haberdashery
US: Notions

??
 
Posts: 635 | Location: London (Isle of Dogs) | Registered: 22 February 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
quote:
and if it is like Aus, you don't get interviewed by the faculty before being offerred a place anymore.


Varies between unis (heh!) and courses.

I'm still laughing about the Shorter Oxford University Happy I had a slightly confusing conversation recently with a neighbour about her nephew going to Brookes College at the University of Oxford Roll Eyes


Haberdashery - I was always a bit confused by those department store signs to Haberdashery and Notions (not so abundant anymore) - which things were which? My feelings were that Haberdashery was the bigger stuff (like interlinings )and notions was the stuff I had to keep going out and buying because they ended up shooting up the vacuum cleaner hose, like needles, bobbins and thimbles.

The word haberdashery just starts off the theme tune to Are You Being Served in my head......
 
Posts: 1404 | Location: London, UK | Registered: 20 September 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PatrickLondon:
John may of course be right about Australia - that's the point. "Varsity" was dead by the end of WW2, I think, other than as the name of the Cambridge student paper. But "uni" was unheard of until about 15-20 years ago in the UK. "Neighbours" is definitely the culprit (and probably for Upspeak as well).
m
Maybe my memory is playing tricks. I graduated in June 1970 and arrived in Australia at Christmas 1970. I don't remember the use of 'uni' sounding strange, but maybe it got lost with the rest of the strine this pommie had to learn. I remember reading some fiction where someone said they thought 'uni' was a better abbreviation than 'varsity'. I thought I read it while I was still in England, but now I'm not sure if I can trust that memory.

Funny thing about Neighbours]. We didn't see it until my mother and sister visited us, and when they went back to England we didn't bother watching any more.


John
"There are two types of problems: those that solve themselves, and those which you can do nothing about"
Isabel Allende's grandmother
 
Posts: 1710 | Location: Mullumbimby, NSW, Australia | Registered: 26 March 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
I don't know what universities were called in UK in the 1960s but I definitely went to Melbourne "uni" in the early 1960s, but I have no idea when it was first used.
 
Posts: 391 | Location: Melbourne, Australia | Registered: 16 January 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
John you are right about 'Neighbours.' We don't watch that rubbish, we export it!

Elly
 
Posts: 1205 | Location: Western Australia | Registered: 27 March 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
US: Exhibit
UK: Exhibition

UK: Exhibit (= an item in an exhibition)
US: ?
 
Posts: 635 | Location: London (Isle of Dogs) | Registered: 22 February 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
Patrick, same in the US - an exhibit in the US is a single display or booth at an exhibition.
 
Posts: 742 | Location: New Hampshire | Registered: 12 September 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
But I regularly see Americans talking about the XX exhibit, meaning a whole exhibition, as opposed to the individual items within it.
 
Posts: 635 | Location: London (Isle of Dogs) | Registered: 22 February 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 635 | Location: London (Isle of Dogs) | Registered: 22 February 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Traveler
Posted Hide Post
We now have access to the Food Network channel shows here in the UK. I have noticed:

US flavorful
UK flavoursome
 
Posts: 90 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PatrickLondon:
As for the Ivy League comparator: there isn't quite one. Universities group themselves in various ways for their pronouncements on Government policy, particularly about funding, as Panda says, and there are various subtle and not-so-subtle attempts to put each other down (some wag used to refer to the former Oxford Poly as the Shorter Oxford University). But - and here I speak from experience - when it comes to marketing to students and the general public, there's never quite enough common ground for a fixed shared identity.

I have just come across this politically incorrect quote on the internet
quote:
Oxbridge rejects from major public schools go to Durham or St Andrews. Posh students who won't admit that they really wanted to go to Oxford, really, go to Bristol or Exeter. Clever posh people who genuinely didn't want Cambridge go to Edinburgh or Sussex or Kings or LSE or sometimes Birmingham (believe it or not). Clever people who aren't posh and don't really care about being posh go to Imperial or Glasgow or Sheffield or Warwick or Leeds. Just possibly Manchester or even Nottingham. Ones who aren't as posh or as clever as they think they are go to York, or if they are having a really bad day, Reading.


John
"There are two types of problems: those that solve themselves, and those which you can do nothing about"
Isabel Allende's grandmother
 
Posts: 1710 | Location: Mullumbimby, NSW, Australia | Registered: 26 March 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PatrickLondon:

I ought, of course, to have researched the thread thoroughly, but while I'm here, have we had:

UK: Haberdashery
US: Notions

??


So I won't find socks at a UK haberdasher? Or hats?
 
Posts: 1117 | Registered: 07 March 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
WSB

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Oxbridge rejects ...
Great quote, John!
 
Posts: 980 | Location: West Sussex, England | Registered: 08 February 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
"Notions" in the US refers to sewing, and knitting-related articles or fabrics.

Hats and other accoutrements such as scarves and gloves would be lumped together as "millinery," in the US. (maybe wallets and billfolds, too...)
 
Posts: 742 | Location: New Hampshire | Registered: 12 September 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
A haberdasher

That's the sort of shop I think of when I hear haberdashery. Doesn't everybody? Confused
 
Posts: 1117 | Registered: 07 March 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
Haberdashery is pretty common, yes.
 
Posts: 742 | Location: New Hampshire | Registered: 12 September 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
quote:
quote:
Oxbridge rejects ...
Great quote, John!


Happy
I'm still laughing at that - my daughter (currently known in this house as The Applicant as in 'Dear Applicant.....)was in fits of laughter. Awful but containing many, many grains of truth. (Though a bit out of date for this year - these things have fashions too...)
 
Posts: 1404 | Location: London, UK | Registered: 20 September 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
quote:
So I won't find socks at a UK haberdasher? Or hats?


I wouldn't expect to, no. To me, the word conveys a shop with things to do with sewing, needlecraft and possibly rather pointless and twee "gifts", probably in a rather chintz-heavy environment - which I understand US "notions" to be.

Most men would get their socks from M&S (or by the mysterious intervention of the family sock fairy). Nick's link is an eye-opener to me - that would be a a "gent's outfitter" in the UK, like this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1fMf8CB7jE
 
Posts: 635 | Location: London (Isle of Dogs) | Registered: 22 February 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
One which I don't think has come up here before are the different types of bed sizes. Something, which I am pains to explain in my business, in case of disappointment Wink

US King
UK Super-king

US Queen
UK King(Just to confuse this issue, before Super-Kings came on the scene we also called these Queens and some people still do....)

In the UK we also have Double (not sure what you call that in the US - about 5 ft wide) Single, and one that my husband calls a 'Sporting Single' which is half way between the two in size. I think its correct name is a large single (about 4 ft). New to the scene and becoming more popular with those who like to be one up on the neighbours, is the Emperor bed which is unecessarily massive but probably good for those close to a divorce. Smile
 
Posts: 583 | Location: The North Cotswolds/Shakespeare Country and Dublin as often as possible. | Registered: 31 March 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
Australia - single and King single (just longer)

Double, Queen and King. Difference between Queen and King is length only.

Elly
 
Posts: 1205 | Location: Western Australia | Registered: 27 March 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Difference between Queen and King is length only.


Ah. With us it is in the width, although Ikea has messed up all the sizes as those Europeans are generally a bit longer and not quite so wide Roll Eyes

But (roughly) Single: 3', Large single 3'6", Small double 4'", Double 5', King 5'6", Super King 6'(and longer than a King as well) and Emperor....I dunno but BIG and you can only buy sheets for them at places like Harrods and Selfridges.
 
Posts: 583 | Location: The North Cotswolds/Shakespeare Country and Dublin as often as possible. | Registered: 31 March 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Moderator Emeritus
Posted Hide Post
Pauline wrote an informative entry (including dimensions) about European/UK/USA bed sizes on her Slow Europe blog: What, No Queen?
 
Posts: 16068 | Location: The Beautiful San Francisco Bay Area | Registered: 06 August 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Double 5',



If only - a lot of times double means a snug 4'6", which many will find far too cosy !
 
Posts: 1404 | Location: London, UK | Registered: 20 September 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
Yes, Panda. I somehow rubbed out the 6" I meant to put on the small double which so often gets advertised as a 'real' double. We have experienced those too and with a 6'6" husband who likes to lie diagonally on small beds there is just a curled up cat's space left for me. Frown i.e. no sleep at all.
 
Posts: 583 | Location: The North Cotswolds/Shakespeare Country and Dublin as often as possible. | Registered: 31 March 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
quote:
diagonally


Happy Happy
I remember having a hilarious conversation with a group of friends after we all married 6 foot plus husbands about this very 'diagonalisation' problem and the resultant hunched up sleeping female halves!
 
Posts: 1404 | Location: London, UK | Registered: 20 September 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
We don't hear "busking" very much in the US and I remember seeing "No Busking" signs in UK - in the States, most people wouldn't know what such a sign meant (except the buskers, of course).

Closest we come is panhandling (which isn't the same, at all) or street performing, which is decriptive enough, but not a single word that captures the definition, as "busking" does.
 
Posts: 742 | Location: New Hampshire | Registered: 12 September 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
US: I live near the airport.
UK I live near to the airport - not always, but frequent
 
Posts: 742 | Location: New Hampshire | Registered: 12 September 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Slow Traveler
Posted Hide Post
We also have buskers in Oz.

US: My bad

Can anyone tell me if there are other nuances to it, or is it just equivalent to

UK: My fault
?


John
"There are two types of problems: those that solve themselves, and those which you can do nothing about"
Isabel Allende's grandmother
 
Posts: 1710 | Location: Mullumbimby, NSW, Australia | Registered: 26 March 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Traveler
Posted Hide Post
These two were covered, but I felt that the coverage was somewhat incomplete--

US: Fanny
UK: Bum

UK: Fanny
US: On a female, the obverse of "bum"

UK: I'll knock you up in the morning
US: I'll knock on your door to wake you up in the morning

US: I'll knock you up in the morning
UK: "Hello, my name is Bond, James Bond..."

The UK people most likely won't get that. The US people will likely be laughing their bums off.

Bill C (a Yank who went to college in London)
 
Posts: 13 | Registered: 06 February 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 ... 20 21 22 23 
 

    Slow Travel Talk  Hop To Forum Categories  TRAVEL  Hop To Forums  United Kingdom & Ireland    WORD GAME: US English vs. English English

© SlowTrav.com 2000 - 2010
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy